European Society of Cardiology quality indicators for the prevention and management of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in cancer treatment.

AIMS: To develop quality indicators (QIs) for the evaluation of the prevention and management of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity. METHODS AND RESULTS: We followed the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) methodology for QI development which comprises (i) identifying the key domains of care for the prevention and management of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in patients on cancer treatment, (ii) performing a systematic review of the literature to develop candidate QIs, and (iii) selecting of the final set of QIs using a modified Delphi process. Work was undertaken in parallel with the writing of the 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology and in collaboration with the European Haematology Association, the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the International Cardio-Oncology Society. In total, 5 main and 9 secondary QIs were selected across five domains of care: (i) Structural framework, (ii) Baseline cardiovascular risk assessment, (iii) Cancer therapy related cardiovascular toxicity, (iv) Predictors of outcomes, and (v) Monitoring of cardiovascular complications during cancer therapy. CONCLUSION: We present the ESC Cardio-Oncology QIs with their development process and provide an overview of the scientific rationale for their selection. These indicators are aimed at quantifying and improving the adherence to guideline-recommended clinical practice and improving patient outcomes.

Sarcoidosis-like reactions in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: experience in a Spanish hospital

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been associated with several immune-related adverse events, including sarcoidosis-like reactions (SLR). SLR, which has a low prevalence but an increasing incidence, is similar to sarcoidosis in terms of histology, and clinical and radiological manifestations. The most commonly affected organs are hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes and skin. SLR is an exclusion diagnosis, so a lymph node biopsy can be useful to distinguish between tumor progression and SLR, particularly in tumors in which nodal involvement is very common. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of SLR in all cancer patients receiving ICIs in our institution between January 2016 and June 2020. Results Among the 1063 treated patients, seven experienced SLR, four of whom were symptomatic (cough, skin lesions, arthralgia), with time to onset ranging from 1.5 to 6.7 months after ICI initiation. All seven patients had bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, and granulomatous reactions in five of the six patients with lymph node biopsies. SLR improved in all patients, including four patients who continued with ICI. Three patients received corticosteroids and/or stopped ICI therapy. Four of these patients had partial responses at the time SLR was identified. Conclusion Management of SLR lacks a consensus recommendation, although corticosteroids and/or stopping the ICI are generally implemented. The potential consequences of stopping anticancer treatment should be taken into consideration, particularly in the absence of clear management recommendations (AU)

Sarcoidosis-like reactions in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: experience in a Spanish hospital.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been associated with several immune-related adverse events, including sarcoidosis-like reactions (SLR). SLR, which has a low prevalence but an increasing incidence, is similar to sarcoidosis in terms of histology, and clinical and radiological manifestations. The most commonly affected organs are hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes and skin. SLR is an exclusion diagnosis, so a lymph node biopsy can be useful to distinguish between tumor progression and SLR, particularly in tumors in which nodal involvement is very common. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of SLR in all cancer patients receiving ICIs in our institution between January 2016 and June 2020. RESULTS: Among the 1063 treated patients, seven experienced SLR, four of whom were symptomatic (cough, skin lesions, arthralgia), with time to onset ranging from 1.5 to 6.7 months after ICI initiation. All seven patients had bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, and granulomatous reactions in five of the six patients with lymph node biopsies. SLR improved in all patients, including four patients who continued with ICI. Three patients received corticosteroids and/or stopped ICI therapy. Four of these patients had partial responses at the time SLR was identified. CONCLUSION: Management of SLR lacks a consensus recommendation, although corticosteroids and/or stopping the ICI are generally implemented. The potential consequences of stopping anticancer treatment should be taken into consideration, particularly in the absence of clear management recommendations.

Una llamada a la esperanza / A call for hope

No disponible

Multidisciplinary approach in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: standard of care and open questions

Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer death worldwide and its global incidence has been steadily increasing during recent decades. A third of patients with newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with locally advanced disease. There is not a single widely accepted standard of care for these patients because of the wide spectrum of presentation of the disease. Although feasible and safe in experienced hands, evidence that surgical resection after induction treatment improves overall survival (OS) is lacking. For resectable or potentially resectable stage III, the findings of two phase III trials suggest that surgical resection should not be considered a standard of care but rather reserved for selected patients after critical multidisciplinary assessment, in whom surgery improves survival after downstaging if pneumonectomy can be avoided or in some T4N0-1 resectable tumours. For unresectable stage III NSCLC the standard of care is a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In those patients with good performance status and minimal weight loss, the concurrent approach has resulted in a statistically significant improvement in OS rates compared with a sequential approach in randomised clinical trials, although several questions remain unresolved (AU)

SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: an updated edition

The purpose of this article is to provide updated recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The staging system for lung cancer has recently been revised by the International Association for Study of Lung Cancer and patients with NSCLC shall now be staged according to the UICC system 7th edition. Recommendations for treatment were based on treatment strategies that improve overall survival. In functionally fit patients with stage I-II disease surgical resection is recommended. Four cycles of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is recommended in patients with pathologic stage II-III. For patients with stage IIIA and non-bulky mediastinal lymph node survival was significantly improved with induction chemotherapy plus surgical resection. Patients with unresectable or bulky stage IIIA and those with stage IIIB, should be treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy. For patients with metastatic disease and performance status of 0 or 1, a platinum-based two-drug combination of cytotoxic drugs is recommended. Nonplatinum cytotoxic doublets are acceptable for patients with contraindications to platinum therapy. For elderly patients and those with performance status of 2, a single cytotoxic drug is sufficient. Stop first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy at disease progression or after four cycles in patients who are not responding to treatment. Stop two-drug cytotoxic chemotherapy at six cycles even in patients who are responding to therapy. The first-line use of gefitinib may be recommended for patients with known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation; for negative or unknown EGFR mutation status, cytotoxic chemotherapy is preferred. Bevacizumab is recommended with platinum-based chemotherapy, except for patients with certain clinical characteristics. Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed or erlotinib increases survival in patients who did not progress after 4 cycles of a platinum based chemotherapy. Docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, or pemetrexed is recommended as second-line therapy. Erlotinib is recommended as third-line therapy for patients who have not received prior erlotinib or gefitinib. Data are insufficient to recommend the routine third-line use of cytotoxic drugs (AU)

Exantema severo por erlotinib (Tarceva (R)) / Erlotinib (Tarceva(R)) induced severe exanthema

No disponible